So it's becoming more and more prominent a thing, the whole driverless car thing.
I was just thinking about it, it'd work. It'd really work, As far as high ways or more open roads are concerned. If indeed it was mandated that you had to have your car on autopilot on long stretches of road, maybe there'd be no more crashing since human error would be eliminated.
It's worth a test. Give it 3 years of intense testing. See if it'll work long term and put it into action eventually.
Driving for me on the high way is easy except for the human factor. You will have some retards driving on there who don't care and will cut you off, bullshit around going too fast or something. So even if they did have it be computer controlled cars, you'd still get assholes on the road being assholes. Wouldn't change that.
I've gotten hit from behind, imagine if the auto breaks thing was mandated already, that wouldn't have happened.
They're working on getting automatic brakes mandated for all vehicles. That if your car senses that it'll hit something, it slams the brakes automatically. I mean, it was just the way it was, I was on the bridge doing my thing going to work. This shit fuck hits me hard, fucks up his car. If auto brakes was implemented wouldn't have happened.
Just an idea I had. I mean, all these goddamn car accidents can definitely be avoided if more cars were computer controlled if not all cars on the big high ways. Of course what you'll get is 90% of the people putting their cars on autopilot, then the too cool for school gang trying to bob and weave through traffic so they can get ahead of the rest of the pack...
There's no easy answer to this. But at least the auto breaks thing should be put into play definitely... That would make cars far safer to have on the streets.
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment