I wish more people did this comparison. I think it's apt.
A lot of vitriol being poured on the new movie. I think a kid will dig it, as I loved a lot of shit as a kid. Being a Kid opens that door to liking utter nonsense no matter how foul.
So yeah, I was thinking about it. GB2 is a shitty movie. Why is the new movie any worse than that garbage?
It isn't...
Sadly it's not "better" than GB2 either. It's just about the same damn movie prettymuch. Some asshole is stirring up evil, yanoosh, the new guy rowan, people have pointed out that they're the same exact villain. They are...
Ghosts get released and the GBs get together to take them down in a fashion that demands they shoot into a central location with their proton packs and such. Same shit different movie.
I can't say I'll watch the new GB over GB2, but a part of me deep down in my anus does kinda like the more fresh modern aspect to the GB than the complete rehash of a film that is GB 2. Such a waste that movie is, but nobody called anyone out on it. Actually yeah, Murray himself loathes the movie, my bad.
Well, that's all I was thinking about tonight. Why I wish GB was done much better than it has today. How they could have dropped the ball the way they did, or even why they did... It's just such a waste the whole thing. Like I said, nobody going to watch home alone 3 over the classic home alone, but when you think about it. Home Alone 3 is a lot better than home alone 2. Same shit different decade can you believe it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment